BOOK 9

The until recently marginal study of ego-texts has become a relevant scientific field, which constantly questions the traditional view of central and peripheral phenomena and authors in literature. This article aims to draw attention to an autobiographer and his autobiographical text, which have remained in the shadow of the traditional literary canon. The study focuses on the interpretation of the autobiography “Povest’ o rozhdenii moyem, proiskhozhdenii i vsey zhizni” of Prince I. M. Dolgorukov (1764–1823), an interesting figure of the Russian cultural scene of the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Although I. M. Dolgorukov was a successful writer during his lifetime, today he is considered a “secondary” author. His voluminous autobiography had a similar not very happy fate, as it remained unpublished for a long time. However, the subject of this text is particularly interesting for understanding the evolutionary dynamics of Russian male autobiographical prose in that epoch. The analysis gives the opportunity to identify some typical characteristics of autobiographies in a period when the genre had not yet crystallized in Russia. At the same time, it highlights the many innovative features of the author’s autobiographical discourse. Therefore, the article also compares I. M. Dolgorukov’s text with the “canonical” autobiographies of A. T. Bolotov (1738–1833) and G. R. Derzhavin (1743–1816).

Microhistory emerged as an independent field after the 1950s, gaining ground in Italy, Mexico, France and the United States. Despite its increasing popularity, comprehensive theoretical and methodological studies have remained few in number for decades. Despite their differences in approach and understanding, the French historian Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie and the Mexican historian Luis González y González, both trained in the French historical schools, were key figures in the development of microhistory. Le Roy Ladurie focuses his archival analysis on the social, economic and religious manifestations of smaller settlements in France. Luis González explores the microcosm of Mexican villages, highlighting local dynamics and local “small” voices. However, both historians emphasize the importance of microscopic details for understanding larger “historical narratives”, despite criticisms from historians influenced by the “linguistic turn”, and despite accusations in reductionism and fictionalisation. The contributions of Le Roy Ladurie and Luis González helped shape microhistory as a nuanced approach to historical research that balances the local “narrative” with the broader socio-political context.

“Life as a quotation” (“das zitathafte Leben”) is a phrase that Thomas Mann formulated in his celebratory speech on the occasion of Sigmund Freud's 80th birthday to present his vision of a life that is always made up of (un)conscious repetitions of prefabricated patterns. This paper offers an analysis of the “life-as-quote” formula in two perspectives. The notion is examined, once, within the writer's speech and, secondly, in the context of psychoanalysis with an emphasis on the mechanisms of identification. Some of the questions the text attempts to answer are: what is quotation in this perspective and what is its significance for literary studies.

The text is dedicated to the peculiar place of Mikhail Bakhtin as a literary theorist. It relies heavily on the work of Galin Tihanov in his recent book The Birth and Death of Literary Theory and also formulates certain critiques of it concerning the important elements that make a literary theorist. Bakhtin is set on the background of two opposing thinkers – Andre Jolles and Erich Auerbach. While Jolles tries to impose his traditional romantic etymological method upon the whole literature and set the genres below certain key words, Auerbach is almost methodless in his attempt to draw the genesis of literature in the perspective of historically oriented sociology. Both Jolles and Auerbach found their theories on certain paraliterary genres and invest them with anthropological and civilizational value. For Jolles these are the “simple forms of narrative” and for Auerbach it is the middle preaching style or genre sermo humilis as a beginning of Western literature. On his part, Bakhtin manages to enter the cannon of literary theory and we shall see why. He represents the intermediate methodological position of literary theory. 

The article traces the genealogy of theory-fiction—a hybrid writing practice that consciously blurs the boundaries between philosophical argument and literary narrative. It begins with the early activities of the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit (CCRU) at the University of Warwick (1995–2003), whose key figures, Nick Land and Mark Fisher, “punctured” academic discourse in order to inject elements of cyberpunk, occultism, and electronic music. Through close readings of Land, Fisher, and Reza Negarestani—especially the novel-essay Cyclonopedia—the study shows how the concept of hyperstition turns literary fiction into an instrument of actual cultural intervention.

Part I situates James Wood’s notion of “hysterical realism” as a historical backdrop for the crystallisation of theory-fiction. Part II analyses CCRU concepts such as “Meltdown” and “spinal catastrophism,” following their passage from lecture halls into the early-2000s blogosphere (K-PUNK, Hyperstition, Xenosystems). Part III examines hyperstition itself: a mechanism by which fictional ideas—like William Burroughs’s “word-viruses” — materialise in socio-technological reality. Finally, deploying Deleuze and Guattari’s idea of “minor literature” (deterritorialized, collective, and inevitably political), the article shows how theory-fictions undermine hierarchies between “high” theory and popular culture. The conclusion defends the thesis that theory-fiction offers a model of radical writing capable of both describing and transforming reality, restoring to philosophy its status as a dangerous, “magical” practice.

The paper makes an inquiry into the structural characteristics of the mainly internet based musical genre of sovietwave. The aim is to simultaneously observe certain features of the cultural context of its actualization and to problematize some contextual codes thought of as self-evident throughout its reception.

The article explores three contemporary Bulgarian novels in order to underline the characteristics that allow us to use the genre definition “documentary novel”. Based on Philippe Lejeune’s 1975 definitions of “autobiography” and “novel”, the article analyses the identity of the three narrative persons in the novels in order to define the distance they have with the two genres. Later, other bordering genres are discussed in order to establish the space that the documentary novel occupies. Certain literary approaches used in the novels are discussed, serving to present the narrative’s fictional side. The article concludes that the documentary novel as such has its place in literature, maintaining at the same time strong bonds with extra-literary genres.

The paper centers around a possible line of interpretation of literature-reality intercourse with the help of author-figure mediation. The autobiographical disposition of the latter in A ballad to Georg Hennih fictional space is what scientific lenses are set upon. Considered the opening first part of an autobiographical trilogy (followed by Germany – a dirty story, and A love story autopsy), A ballad to Georg Hennih short novel inaugurates autofiction as Victor Paskov’s literary style and means of recognition. The ballade’s world is based on a playful dialogue between fictional and real, skillfully handled by Paskov’s own maneuver of questioning author’s status in the twofold manifestation of self-revealing and being a novel’s character. The self-revealing dimension is imbued with childhood trauma thus launching the long-term journey of answering the essential question “Who am I really?”

The article researches Todor P. Todorov’s novel Hagabula as a distinctive contribution to Bulgarian magical realism, combining myth, history, and global exploration. Central are two female archetypes: the witch, embodied in a young, beautiful woman whose connection to the supernatural reopens humanity’s roots, and the grandmother, familiar from Bulgarian literature as a symbol of primal time and maternal essence but also appearing as a magical figure in the literature of the 1960s and 1970s. Todorov transforms the grandmother figure into a rejuvenated, magical witch, thus bridging tradition and innovation. The article examines how the novel stages both the loss of home and the search for the new in general, positioning Hagabula simultaneously as a departure from and a continuation of the Bulgarian literary heritage of root-seeking from the previous century.

The task of “Jests of the Infinite: Introduction to David Foster Wallace” is to mark some key aspects within the thought of the contemporary author David Foster Wallace. The main goal of the article is to open a conceptual field where the texts of a little known within the local context author could be discussed, analysed and criticised.

It is in this sense that the article is explicitly introductory and therefore limited not only to Wallace’s most famous work – the 1000+ pages maximalist novel “Infinite Jest” — but also to its title. Thus, what “Jests of the Infinite” presents is a speculative reading of the novel’s title, which is a quote from Shakespeare’s “Hamlet”. It is through this speculative reading that the article explores some of Wallace’s key ideas, themes and positions. Ideas and positions, which trace and weave together the fields of contemporary philosophy (both analytic and continental), Lacanian psychoanalysis and mathematics. So, what article еxplicates is how the mentioned fields can be found already within the title of Wallace’s maximalist novel. And furthermore, how such an explication opens the possibility for an interesting rethinking of modern culture’s constitutive tragedy (Hamlet) and also how it can ground the dynamic conceptual space for Wallace’s thought.

Last but not least, after the explication of the title, which will focus mainly on the concepts of the “jest” and the “infinite”, the article concludes with marking a specific counter-intuitive relation between Wallace’s thought and literary project and the philosophy of Alain Badiou whose project regards the fields of psychoanalysis and mathematics as crucial for the creation of a rigorous and operative contemporary ontology

Geo Milev’s poem “September” can be read as a socio-political dystopia-utopia. It belongs to a tradition that stretches from Plato’s Republic, through Plutarch’s “Lycurgus” and Thomas More’s Utopia, to Mikhail Gorbachev’s Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World. The study begins by identifying several key signifying discourses and cultural codes that frame the poem as a dystopia-utopia. It then sketches the theoretical parameters of the dystopian-utopian genre. Finally, the analysis demonstrates that “September” embodies the core features of this genre. The study concludes by identifying those utopian aspects that enabled communist literary criticism to interpret “September” as a prophetic vision of communism’s inevitable victory in Bulgaria. The approach is comparative, engaging both Bulgarian and Euro-American historical and theoretical contexts. The interpretation examines the poem on multiple levels—philosophical, aesthetic, poetic, and phonetic.

Споровете около канона, избух- нали във втората половина на 1980-те и разгорещили се в следващите две десетилетия, са имали разнообразни следствия. Едно от тях е, че те са оста- вили до голяма степен извън критическото внимание понятието за „класика“ и „класическо“ със специфичното му място в историята на идеите. Така, след началната саморазправа с него, от една страна, то започва да изглежда твърде лесно заменимо, например от по-ясно ангажираното с политическите залози на хуманитарните изследвания понятие за „канон“. Класическото се критикува като канонично и канонизирано. Тъкмо поради тази причина то се оказва не просто заменимо, а отстранимо. В съ- временното литературознание думите „класика“ и „класическо“ вече рядко се употребяват критически.

През 2022 година литературният проект Future Fiction, който обещава да представя научнофантастични сюжети, способни да ни помогнат да разберем утрешния ден, публикува малък сборник, наречен Meteotopia: Futures of Climate (In)Justice („Метеотопия: Сюжети на климатичната (не)справедливост“). Замисълът на тази социално ангажирана книжка бе наистина мащабен; тя започва с манифест от Франческо Версо и Ана Рюше, според които „от зората на времето отношението между човека и природата […] има две постоянни характеристики: уважение и подчинение“. През последните векове обаче „подчинението успя да прекърши уважението. Експлоатацията зае мястото на разумното управление. И науката разомагьоса древната мистика на природата, оголвайки я за всеки, който би пожелал да се домогне до нейните ресурси“. Основен виновник за всичко това, разбира се, е капиталистическата система, която днес, в епохата на антропоцена, изглежда, „вече няма конкуренти“ , и тази нейна неоспорвана хегемония прави въобразяването на алтернативни светове трудна, дори невъзможна, но пък за сметка на това необходима задача. Именно с това ужасно сложно начинание се захваща „Метеотопия“ – за да се провали главозамайващо на всички възможни нива