“THEY SAY THAT THE TSAR IS NOT REAL!” RUSSIAN PROJECTIONS OF THE STORY OF THE REPLACED TSAR
Narratives questioning the ruler’s authenticity have existed since time immemorial—both as an effective weapon in political struggle and as an outlet for deep social anxieties. The tsar’s inauthenticity has two main forms: active (impostorism) and passive (the substitution of certain people or forces for the real one). The study focuses on Russian projections of the tsar-substitute narrative. It manifested itself most clearly and fully in relation to Emperor Peter the Great, the builder of modern Russian statehood. An analysis of the factual material revealed that it is more appropriate to speak not of a single plot, but of a more complex structure—a megaplot. Many of its elements emerged simultaneously at the turn of the 17th and 18th centuries, and from then until today, they have remained in a state of dynamic interweaving, mutual complementarity, and development. Some of them have acquired autonomy (miraculous rescue, the arrival of a savior), while others have narrowed to the level of motif (the shape-shifter). The mega-plot about the replaced ruler is built on two components, which can be roughly defined as realistic and mystical. The core of the realistic com- ponent is the replacement of the tsar (at a genetic level, in childhood, abroad) by certain very specific individuals, which is conceived as an actual event. The mystical plot threads are connected through the profound archetypes of the Double and the Changeling, which, by activating the age-old fears of the Shape-shifter—half-man, half-beast—introduce the apoca- lyptic Beast into the collective consciousness of the Petrine era. Along- side him, other aspects of the Antichrist are also realized—the God-fighter and false Christ, whose visualization in opposition circles is Peter the Great. The plots created during this crucial era proved exceptionally effective, leading to their use on the emperor’s political heirs. The mystical element remained in the public debates of the past, but resonated in Russian literature (the works of A. S. Pushkin and D. S. Merezhkovsky). Realistic element, on the contrary, is increasingly present today thanks to digital technology. The sensational plot of a ruler being replaced, complemented by spinoffs of miraculous rescues and the redeemer of royal blood, draws more and more new faces into its orbit.
“THEY SAY THAT THE TSAR IS NOT REAL!” RUSSIAN PROJECTIONS OF THE STORY OF THE REPLACED TSAR
-
-
Radoslava Ilcheva
- [email protected]
- Institute for Literature – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
- България
Radoslava Ilcheva is an Associate Professor with a PhD in Philology at the Institute for Literature, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. She graduated in Russian Philology from Kuban State University (Krasnodar, Russia) in 1985 and completed her full-time doctoral fellowship in the Russian Literature Department at the Institute for Literature in 1990. In 1993, she defended her doctoral dissertation titled "Old Russian Literature in the Historical and Literary Development of Russia During the First Quarter of the 19th Century". In 2002, she obtained her habilitation with the work "At the Crossroads of Centuries: A. S. Pushkin's 'The Bronze Horseman' – Statics and Dynamics". She is the author of over 130 articles and studies published in volumes, series, and journals in Bulgaria and abroad, and has participated in nearly 90 national and international academic conferences. She has held long-standing teaching positions in practical Russian language at New Bulgarian University, in Russian folklore and 11th–18th-century Russian literature at Paisii Hilendarski University of Plovdiv (including its branch in Smolyan), in 19th–20th-century Russian literature at NBU, and in Old Russian literature at Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski". Her research interests and academic expertise cover the history of 11th–19th-century Russian literature, literary myths, Russian emigration to Bulgaria, literary anthroponymy, Bulgarian-Russian literary relations, and the Bulgarian theme in Russian literature.
-
-
Abstract:Narratives questioning the ruler’s authenticity have existed since time immemorial—both as an effective weapon in political struggle and as an outlet for deep social anxieties. The tsar’s inauthenticity has two main forms: active (impostorism) and passive (the substitution of certain people or forces for the real one). The study focuses on Russian projections of the tsar-substitute narrative. It manifested itself most clearly and fully in relation to Emperor Peter the Great, the builder of modern Russian statehood. An analysis of the factual material revealed that it is more appropriate to speak not of a single plot, but of a more complex structure—a megaplot. Many of its elements emerged simultaneously at the turn of the 17th and 18th centuries, and from then until today, they have remained in a state of dynamic interweaving, mutual complementarity, and development. Some of them have acquired autonomy (miraculous rescue, the arrival of a savior), while others have narrowed to the level of motif (the shape-shifter). The mega-plot about the replaced ruler is built on two components, which can be roughly defined as realistic and mystical. The core of the realistic com- ponent is the replacement of the tsar (at a genetic level, in childhood, abroad) by certain very specific individuals, which is conceived as an actual event. The mystical plot threads are connected through the profound archetypes of the Double and the Changeling, which, by activating the age-old fears of the Shape-shifter—half-man, half-beast—introduce the apoca- lyptic Beast into the collective consciousness of the Petrine era. Along- side him, other aspects of the Antichrist are also realized—the God-fighter and false Christ, whose visualization in opposition circles is Peter the Great. The plots created during this crucial era proved exceptionally effective, leading to their use on the emperor’s political heirs. The mystical element remained in the public debates of the past, but resonated in Russian literature (the works of A. S. Pushkin and D. S. Merezhkovsky). Realistic element, on the contrary, is increasingly present today thanks to digital technology. The sensational plot of a ruler being replaced, complemented by spinoffs of miraculous rescues and the redeemer of royal blood, draws more and more new faces into its orbit.
Subject: East of the New AgeKeywords: substitution replacement double changeling Antichrist Peter the Great -
References
ABRAMYAN, L. A. 1977. Ob ideye dvoynichestva po nekotorym etnograficheskim i fol’klornym dannym. – Istoriko-filologicheskiy zhurnal, 1977, № 2, s. 177–190.
ALEKSANDROV, G. N. Pechat’ Antikhrista – Russkiy arkhiv, 1873, kn. 2, № 10, stbts. 2068–2074; № 11, stbts. 02296–02297.
BULGAKOV, M. A. Ivan Vasil'yevich. Komediya v trekh deystviyakh: https://www.100bestbooks.ru/files/Bulgakov_Ivan_Vasilevich.pdf?ysclid=mjx6ybw1xy725553876 (data obrashcheniya 22.11.2025).
BASNIN, P. P. Raskol’nich’i legendy o Petre Velikom. – Istoricheskiy vestnik, 1903, t. 92, may, s. 513–548.
Vypisana istoriya pechatnaya o Petre Velikom. Sobraniye ot Svyatago Pisaniya o Antikhriste. – V: Chteniya v Imperatorskom obshchestve istorii i drevnostey rossiyskikh pri Moskovskom universitete. 1863. Yanvar’–mart. Kniga pervaya. Razdel V. Smes’. Moskva: V universitetskoy tipografii, 1863, s. 52–71.
VINOGRADOVA, L. N. Podmenysh. – V: Slavyanskiye drevnosti. Etnolingvisticheskiy slovar’ v pyati tomakh pod obshchey redaktsiyey N. I. Tolstogo. T. 4. Moskva: Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, 2009, s. 98–103.
GAKSTGAUZEN, A. Izsledovaniya vnutrennikh otnosheniy narodnoy zhizni i v osobennosti sel’skikh uchrezhdeniy Rossii. Moskva: Institut russkoy tsivilizatsii, 2017.
GOLIKOVA N. B. Politicheskiye protsessy pri Petre Pervom. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1957.
GURA, A. V. Koshka. – V: Slavyanskiye drevnosti. Etnolingvisticheskiy slovar’ v 5-ti tomakh. Tom 2. Moskva: Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, 1999, s. 637–640.
GUR'YANOVA, N. S. Krest'yanskiy antimonarkhicheskiy protest v staroobryadcheskoy eskhatologicheskoy literature perioda pozdnego feodalizma. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Sibirskoye otdeleniye, 1988.
DERZHAVIN, G. R. Sochineniya Derzhavina. S ob’yasnitel’nymi primechaniyami Ya. Grota. 2-ye akad. izd. V 9 t. T. 1. Sankt-Peterburg: Tip. Imperatorskoy Akademii nauk, 1868.
DOLGORUKOV, P. V. Peterburgskiye ocherki. Pamflety emigranta. Moskva: Novosti, 1992.
YESIPOV, G. V. Raskol’nich’i dela XVIII stoletiya. Izvlechennyye iz del Preobrazhenskogo prikaza i taynoy rozysknykh del kantselyarii G. Yesipovym. Sankt-Peterburg: Tipografiya tovarishchestva „Obshchestvennaya pol’za“, t. I, 1861; t. II, 1863.
ZHIVOV, V. M., B. A. USPENSKIY. Metamorfozy antichnogo yazychestva v istorii russkoy kul'tury XVII–XVIII vekov. – V: Iz istorii russkoy kul’tury. T. IV (XVIII – nachalo XIX veka), Moskva: Shkola „Yazyki russkoy kul’tury“, 1996, s. 449–535.
Ivan Vasil’evich menyayet professiyu (4K, komediya, rezh. Leonid Gayday, 1973 g.): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QYeDY7Wmmg (data obrashcheniya 16.12. 2025).
Ivan Groznyy. Poslaniye Simeonu Bekbulatovichu (1575): http://historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000112/st010.shtml (data obrashcheniya 05.07.2023).
Kak podmenyali Petra I. Greebanal. Neformal’naya istoriya Peterburga: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6r07TOSzzmA, 0:58 (data obrashcheniya 27.12. 2025).
KANN, P. Ya. Progulki po Peterburgu. Sankt-Peterburg: Palitra, 1994.
KRASTEVA, D. Politicheski metafori i syuzheti v ruskata literatura na XVIII–XIX vek (Literatura – Ideologicheska istoriya – Neofitsialni razkazi za dvoretsa). Shumen: UI „Episkop Konstantin Preslavski“, 2013
LEVKIYEVSKAYA, Ye. Ye. Mify russkogo naroda. Moskva: Astrel’ AST, 2005.
LOMONOSOV, M. V. Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy. T. 8. Poeziya, Oratorskaya proza. Nadpisi 1732–1764. Moskva–Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1959.
MEL'NIKOV, P. I. Materialy dlya istorii khlystovskoy i skopcheskoy yeresey, sobrannyye P. I. Mel'nikovym. Otdel Tretiy. Pravitel’stvennyye rasporyazheniya, vypiski i zapiski o skoptsakh do 1826 goda. – V: Chteniya v Imperatorskom obshchestve istorii i drevnostey Rossiyskikh pri Moskovskom universitete, 1872, iyul’–sentyabr’, kniga tret’ya. Moskva: V universitetskoy tipografii na Strastnom bul’vare, V Smes’, s. 27–328.
MILYUKOV, P. N. Ocherki po istorii russkoy kul’tury. Chast’ vtoraya. Tserkov’ i shkola (vera, tvorchestvo, obrazovaniye). Izdaniye redaktsii zhurnala „Mir Bozhiy“. 3-ye izdaniye, ispravlennoye i dopolnennoye. Sankt-Peterburg: Tipografiya I. N. Skorokhodova, 1902.
NADEZHDIN, N. I. Raskol'nichiy apokalipsiy. – V: Chteniya v Imperatorskom obshchestve istorii i drevnostey rossiyskikh pri Moskovskom universitete. 1872. Iyul’–sentyabr’. Kniga tret'ya. Razdel V. Smes’. Moskva: V universitetskoy tipografii, 1872, s. 8–17.
NEKLYUDOV, S. O. Oborotnichestvo. – V: Mify narodov mira. Entsiklopediya v dvukh tomakh. Tom 2. Moskva: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1988, s. 234–235.
NIKOLOVA, Yu. Alafrangata. – V: Da mislim Drugoto – obrazi, stereotipi, krizi. XVIII–XX vek. Sofia: Kralitsa Mab, 2001, s. 390–398.
OBUKHOVA, Yu. A. Fenomen monarkhicheskikh samozvantsev v kontekste rossiyskoy istorii (po materialam XVIII stoletiya). Tyumen’: TIU, 2016.
PAVLOV, A. S. Proiskhozhdeniye raskol’nicheskogo ucheniya ob antikhriste. – Pravoslavnyy sobesednik, izdavayemyy pri Kazanskoy dukhovnoy akademii. Chast’ vtoraya, Kazan’: v tipografii gubernskogo pravleniya, 1858, s. 138–301.
PANOVA, T. D. Ivan Groznyy, yego predki i rodnya: Istoriya v litsakh i sud’by v svete novykh issledovaniy. Moskva: Kuchkovo pole, 2024.
PEKARSKIY, P. Nauka i literatura v Rossii pri Petre Velikom. T. II. Sankt-Peterburg: Izdaniye tovarishchestva „Obshchestvennaya pol’za“, 1862.
Podmena Petra I. Razbor mifa: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqBdfpfEkuA (data obrashcheniya 30.01.2024).
Podmenili li Petra I? Otvety na vashi voprosy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Brc-i5C2XA0 (data obrashcheniya 03.07.2025).
Poucheniye Daniila, mitropolita vseya Rusi. – V: Pamyatniki literatury Drevney Rusi. Konets XV – pervaya polovina XVI veka. Moskva: Hudozhestvennaya literatura, 1984.
PUSHKIN, A.S. Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy v 10 tomakh. Izdaniye chetvertoye. T. 9. Leningrad: Nauka, Leningradskoye otdeleniye, 1979.
PYPIN, A. N. Petr Velikiy v narodnom predanii. – Vestnik YEvropy, 1897, t. 4, kn. 8, s. 640–690.
Pyat’ „podmenennykh“ tsarey v russkoy istorii: https://russian7.ru/post/5-podmenennykh-carejj-v-russkojj-istorii/ (data obrashcheniya 03.07.2025).
Razbor fal’sifikatsii. Pravda li, chto Petra I podmenili vo vremya Velikogo posol’stva?: https://historyrussia.org/sobytiya/razbor-falsifikatsij-pravda-li-chto-petra-i-podmenili-vo-vremya-velikogo-posolstva.html (data obrashcheniya 15.08.2025).
ROVINSKIY, D. N. Russkiye narodnyye kartinki. Sankt-Peterburg: Tipografiya Imperatorskoy akademii nauk, 1881.
SEMEVSKIY, M. I. Slovo i delo. 1700–1725. Moskva: Moskovskiy kadrovyy tsentr. Sovmestnoye predpriyatiye X. G. S., 1991.
SINDALOVSKIY, N. A. Istoriya Sankt-Peterburga v predaniyakh i legendakh. Sankt-Peterburg: Norint, 1997.
SOLOV'YEV, S. M. Istoriya Roosii s drevneyshikh vremen. kn. VIII. 1703 – nachalo 20‑kh godov XVIII veka, glava vtoraya: http://www.co6op.ru/sites/default/files/istoriya_rossii_s_drevneyshih_vremen._kniga_viii._1703_-_nachalo_20-h_godov_xviii_veka_-_2001.pdf (data obrashcheniya 15.12. 2024).
SOLOV'YEV, S. M. Skazka o Petre Velikom. – V: Chteniya v Imperatorskom obshchestve istorii i drevnostey Rossiyskikh pri Moskovskom universitete. 1862, oktyabr’–dekabr’, kniga chetvertaya. Moskva: V universitetskoy tipografii, razdel V. Smes’, s. 2.
TRUAYYA, A. Petr Pervyy [onlayn]. Moskva: Eksmo, 2007: https://libcat.ru/knigi/proza/istoricheskaya-proza/217101-anri-truajya-petr-pervyj.html#text (data obrashcheniya 05.01.2025).
TUL’CHINSKIY G. L. Samozvanstvo. Fenomenologiya zla i metafizika svobody. Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteyya, 2018.
USPENSKIY, B. A. Tsar' i samozvanets: samozvanchestvo v Rossii kak kul'turno-istoricheskiy fenomen. – V: USPENSKIY B. A. Izbrannyye trudy. T. 1. Semiotika istorii. Semiotika kul'tury. Moskva: Shkola „Yazyki russkoy kul'tury“, 1996, s. 142–183.
FROLOV, S. 2017. Muzey Stalina i gruzinskiye korni Petra Pervogo. 27 avgusta 2017 [onlayn]. Sayt Ufostation: https://www.ufostation.net/readarticle.php?article_id=1976 (data obrashcheniya 12.09.2017).
CHISTOV, K. V. Russkiye narodnyye sotsial'no-utopicheskiye legendy XVII–XIX vv. Moskva: Nauka, 1967.
SHMURLO, Ye. F. Petr Velikiy v otsenke sovremennikov i potomstva. Sankt-Peterburg: Senatskaya tipografiya, 1912, vyp.1 (XVIII v.).
LORTHOLARY, A. Les „philosophes“ du XVIII siécle et la Russie: le mirage russe en France au XVIII siècle. Paris: Éd. contemporaines, 1951.
TROYAT H. Pierre le Grand. Paris: Flammarion, 1979.
VOLTAIRE, F.-М. A M. Thomas а Ferney, 14 juin 1771. – In: F.-М. VOLTAIRE. Œuvres complètes de Voltaire. 1876–1888. T. XIII, 1876.
