TAMING GEORGE SAND, OR ON THE SELECTIVE RECEPTION OF EURO- PEAN MODERNITY DURING THE BULGARIAN NATIONAL REVIVAL
The present article examines the reception of George Sand in Bulgarian Revival culture, considering it as a process of selective appropriation of Eu- ropean modernity. The main thesis is that nineteenth-century Bulgarian society did not adopt Sand’s work directly or in its entirety, but rather “domesticated” it by adapting it to its own moral and ideological norms. The study draws on 270reception aesthetics (Jauss, Iser), the theory of translation as rewriting (Lefevere), cultural transfer theory, and polysystem theory in order to demonstrate that translation functions as an active mechanism of filtering and rearranging foreign texts. In this context, Bulgarian translators act as cultural mediators who select and adapt Sand’s works according to the “horizon of expectations” of the National Revival reader. The analysis shows that predominantly moralizing and pastoral works entered the Bulgarian cultural milieu, while the more radical novels addressing issues of female autonomy, sexuality, and the critique of marriage remained outside the translated corpus. This selective appropriation transforms Sand’s image from that of a socially critical emancipatory writer into a “safe” moralist, compatible with the patriarchal values of Revival society. At the same time, her translations perform an important cultural function: they introduce new aesthetic models, romantic motifs, and social sensibilities, while contributing to the formation of the national literary system. The reception of George Sand in the Bulgarian National Revival is thus strictly selective and adaptive, admitting only those elements of European modernity that can be in- tegrated into the local moral and cultural context. This process reveals a broader mechanism of cultural mediation, whereby modernity is appropriated not as a direct transfer but as a transformed and ideologically refracted phenomenon.
TAMING GEORGE SAND, OR ON THE SELECTIVE RECEPTION OF EURO- PEAN MODERNITY DURING THE BULGARIAN NATIONAL REVIVAL
-
-
Boyka Ilieva
- [email protected]
- South-West University “Neofit Rilski”
- Bulgaria
Boyka Ilieva is an Associate Professor of Classical and Western European Literature at South-West University "Neofit Rilski", as well as a research associate at the Institute for Literature, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. She is the author of the monographs "Italy in the Culture of the Bulgarian National Revival: Translations and Literary Influences" (2012) and "The Inspiration Called Italy: Literary Contexts 1878–1918" (2019), the university textbook "Western European Literature: Aesthetic Texts and Frameworks" (2017), alongside numerous articles in academic volumes and journals. She serves as President of the Bulgarian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies and is a member of the Academic Circle for Comparative Literature. Her research interests focus on literary reception, comparative literature, imagology, and women's writing. She is on the editorial boards of the academic journals "Orbis Linguarum" ("Езиков свят") and "The Long Eighteenth Century".
-
-
Abstract:The present article examines the reception of George Sand in Bulgarian Revival culture, considering it as a process of selective appropriation of Eu- ropean modernity. The main thesis is that nineteenth-century Bulgarian society did not adopt Sand’s work directly or in its entirety, but rather “domesticated” it by adapting it to its own moral and ideological norms. The study draws on 270reception aesthetics (Jauss, Iser), the theory of translation as rewriting (Lefevere), cultural transfer theory, and polysystem theory in order to demonstrate that translation functions as an active mechanism of filtering and rearranging foreign texts. In this context, Bulgarian translators act as cultural mediators who select and adapt Sand’s works according to the “horizon of expectations” of the National Revival reader. The analysis shows that predominantly moralizing and pastoral works entered the Bulgarian cultural milieu, while the more radical novels addressing issues of female autonomy, sexuality, and the critique of marriage remained outside the translated corpus. This selective appropriation transforms Sand’s image from that of a socially critical emancipatory writer into a “safe” moralist, compatible with the patriarchal values of Revival society. At the same time, her translations perform an important cultural function: they introduce new aesthetic models, romantic motifs, and social sensibilities, while contributing to the formation of the national literary system. The reception of George Sand in the Bulgarian National Revival is thus strictly selective and adaptive, admitting only those elements of European modernity that can be in- tegrated into the local moral and cultural context. This process reveals a broader mechanism of cultural mediation, whereby modernity is appropriated not as a direct transfer but as a transformed and ideologically refracted phenomenon.
Subject: We for Others and for OurselvesKeywords: George Sand Bulgarian Revival period reception translated literature cultural transfer -
References
ALEKSANDROVA, N. Zhenite kato avtorki i prevodachki prez Vazrazhdaneto. – V: Zhenite v modernostta. Izvestiya na Regionalen istoricheski muzey – Ruse. 2013, № 17, s. 45–56.
ARETOV, N. Mezhdu „nauchnopouchitelnoto“ i „zabavnoto“. Prevodachat St. S. Bobchev. – V: Stefan Savov Bobchev 1853–1940: Zhivot i deynost. Yubileen sbornik dokladi ot nauchna konferentsiya, organizirana ot Narodnata biblioteka „Sv. sv. Kiril i Metodiy“, posvetena na 140-god. ot rozhdenieto mu, Sofiya, 4. noem. 1993 g. Red. Dora Tomova, Tsvetolyub Nushev. Sofia: NB „Sv. sv. Kiril i Metodiy“, 1999, s. 163–171.
BAKALOV, G. Studii, statii, retsenzii. T. I. Sofia: Balgarski pisatel, 1983, 660 s.
BOTEV, Hr. [„Dyavolsko blato“ ot Zhorzh Sand]. – Zname, I, 1874, № 3.
BOBCHEV, St. S. „Pikilyo Aliyaga ili Mavrite v tsaruvanieto na Filipa III“ ot Ev. Skriba. – Chitalishte, V, 1875, № 6, s. 269–271.
GENCHEV, N. Frantsiya v balgarskoto dukhovno vazrazhdane. Sofia: UI „Kliment Ohridski“, 1979.
DANCHOV, N. G., I. G. DANCHOV. Balgarska entsiklopediya. Sofia: Knigoizdatelstvo St. Atanasov, 1936.
ILIEVA, B. Dvoystvenoto „povedenie“ na balgarskata vazrozhdenska kultura v rolyata ѝ na retzipient. – V: Slovesnost i literatura: Yubileen sbornik v chest na 60-godishninata na prof. dfn Encho Mutafov. Blagoevgrad: UI „Neofit Rilski“, 2003, s. 136–141.
KASAROV, L. Entsiklopedicheski rechnik. Ch. I. A–K. Plovdiv: D. V. Manchov, 1899.
KIROVA, M. Zhenite i kanonat: myarkata, koyato ne e edna. – V: Neslucheniyat kanon. Balgarski pisatelki ot Vazrazhdaneto do Vtorata svetovna voyna. Sofia: Altera, 2009, s. 9–46.
MINKOVA, L. Realno i nerealno prisastvie (Zhorzh Sand v prevodnata literatura na Balgarskoto vazrazhdane). – Literaturna misal, XXXI, 1987, № 10, s. 76–83.
MINKOVA, L. Retseptsiata na Zhorzh Sand v Balgariya. – V: Dokladi ot vtoriya mezhdunaroden kongres po balgaristika. T. 13. Prevod i retseptsiya na balgarskata literatura v chuzhbina i na chuzhdestrannata literatura v Balgariya. Sofia: Izdatelstvo na BAN, s. 81–87.
PAVLOV, T. Hristo Botev. Sofia: Balgarski pisatel, 1949.
SAND, G. Dyavolskoto blato. Prevel ot frenskiy Marko D. Balabanov. Tsarigrad: Pechatnitsa na Karapetrov i Druzh., 1874.
SAND, G. Samodivata, ili avstriitsite vav Venetsiya. Prev. St. S. Bobchev. – Napredak, X, 1876, № 87–91.
SAND, G. Indiana. Klasicheski romani i povesti. Prev. Penka Proykova. Plovdiv: Hristo G. Danov, 1981.
SEVERSKI, Tsv. Urotsite na Zhorzh Sand (Neobozrimata lyubov na edna zhena s mazhki kharakter i mazhko pisane). – V: Taynite na vdahnovitelnkite. Noveli za lyubovnite avantyuri na veliki tvortsi. Sofia: Partner BG, 2018: https://chitanka.info/text/42488-urotsite-na-zhorzh-sand (pregl. 12.03.2026).
SIMOVA, Zh. Evgeniya Mars – vav i otvad marginalnostta. – V: Neslucheniyat kanon. Balgarski pisatelki ot Vazrazhdaneto do Vtorata svetovna voyna. Sofia: Altera, 2009, s. 133–152.
STANEVA, K. Zhenite pisatelki prez Vazrazhdaneto. – V: Neslucheniyat kanon. Balgarski pisatelki ot Vazrazhdaneto do Vtorata svetovna voyna. Sofia: Altera, 2009, s. 47–76.
JAUSS, H. R. Literaturnata istoriya kato provokatsiya kam literaturoznanieto – V: H. R. Yaus. Istoricheski opit i literaturna hermenevtika. Sofia: UI „Sv. Kliment Ohridski“, 1998, s. 27–87.
BELZER, All. S. The Ashurst Sisters: Nurturing Rebellion Across the Nineteenth Century. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2025.
ESPAGNE, M., M. Werner. La construction d’une référence culturelle allemande en France: genèse et histoire (1750–1914). – Annales ESC, 43, 1988, № 4, pp. 969–992.
ESPAGNE, M. La notion de transfert culturel. – Revue Sciences/Lettres, 2013, № 1: https://doi.org/10.4000/rsl.219 (seen 12.03.2026).
EVEN-ZOHAR, It. Polysystem Studies. – Poetics Today, Vol. 11, 1990, № 1.
GILBERT, S., S. GUBAR. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.
GRANT, R. B. George Sand’s “La mare au diable”: a study in male passivity. – Nineteenth-Century French Studies, Vol. 13, 1985, № 4, pp. 211–223.
ISER, W. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.
LAPORTE, D. “Ne m’appelez donc jamais femme auteur”: Déconstruction et refus du roman sentimental chez George Sand. – Nineteenth-Century French Studies, Vol. 29, 2001, № 3/4, pp. 247–255.
LEFEVERE, A. Translation, Rewriting, and the Manipulation of Literary Fame. London & New York: Routledge, 1992.
MEYER, P. An Author of His Time: Lermontov Rewrites George Sand. – New Zealand Slavonic Journal, 2002, pp. 173–182.
Òrco. – Treccani. Enciclopedia italiana online: https://www.treccani.it/vocabolario/orco/?search=%C3%B2rco%2F (seen 17.02.2026).
SAND, G. Histoire de ma vie: 4e (suite) et 5e partie. Vol. 4. Paris: Éditions Calmann Lévy, 1902 (1re éd. 1856).
SAND, G. L’Orco. A Legend of Venice. – The Crayon, Vol. 2, 1855, № 21, pp. 321– 323.
SAND, G. Notice. – In: G. SAND. La mare au diable; André; La noce du village; La fauvette du docteur. Préface et notice nouvelle. Paris: J. Hetzel, 1857.
[SAND, G.] Œuvres illustrées de George Sand. T. 1. Paris: Michel Lévy frères, 1867.
